
Scarab Amulet
Description
<p>The amulet should provide its owner with continual (oval frame) perfection and prosperity, as well as all-inclusive renewal (spiral scrolls).</p><p>For the latest information about this object, <cite><a href='https://purl.thewalters.org/art/42.25' rel='external'>Scarab Amulet</a></cite>, visit the Online Collection of the Walters Art Museum.</p>
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small oval scarab amulet of beige steatite with a raised, dark-incised field containing multiple vertical and curving hieroglyph-like forms, with a darker central motif.
The object is shown front-on as an oval disk typical of Egyptian scarab/amuletic designs. The surface is beige with clear darker outlines and infilled grooves, suggesting an originally glazed or pigment-filled design now worn. Around the recessed/incised border are thick, rounded strokes forming cartouche-like and text-like elements in vertical arrangement. At the center there is a raised element resembling a small column topped by a rounded/umbelliform form; beneath it sits a rounded terminal that could be decorative rather than securely legible text. No clearly identifiable royal cartouche (king’s name) or deity figure is unambiguous from the photo; the surrounding marks are consistent with hieroglyphic ornament typical of amulets but remain too indistinct to identify specific signs with confidence. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. The catalogued materials (beige steatite, originally glazed) are consistent with the visible light stone and dark remaining in the incisions.
Inscriptions (1)
English description
Cross-references (2)
- Walters-AccNum 42.25 tier-2
- Walters-id 31161 tier-2
Similar inscriptions · by content embedding
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Walters Art Museum (Egyptian).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.


