Art Institute of Chicago (Egyptian) · scarab

Scarab: Wish Formula

Source of record: Art Institute of Chicago (Egyptian) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Two views of a small Egyptian scarab-shaped amulet inscribed on the back with worn hieroglyphic decoration resembling a wish/blessing formula.

The image shows the same object photographed from two angles against a light background. On the left view, the scarab form is seen as an oval/rounded back with a slightly raised central ridge and faint incised/relief lines on the dorsal surface; the details are heavily worn and abraded. On the right view, the object shows the underside or a different dorsal section with clearer, though still worn, incised bands and a rectangular layout containing small, rounded/oval motifs and lines that resemble hieroglyphic signs. No clearly readable cartouche or full deity figure is visible due to wear. The decoration appears to be text or a formula consistent with an amuletic scarab inscription, but the exact signs cannot be confidently identified from this image.

religious unknown fragmentary
Materials stonepossibly steatite (consistent with catalogue)
Signs incised hieroglyphic signs/ornamental text (not legible enough to identify specific determinatives) ×6

Inscriptions (1)

Inscription #1

English description

"When Amun-Re is watchful there is no fear"

Cross-references (1)

  • ARTIC-id 134295 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Art Institute of Chicago (Egyptian).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.