
Block Statue of Nes-Ba-Neb-Dedet
Description
<p>This figure is a squatting priest who has his hands crossed o his knees. There is an inscription on the sides of the pedestal, the front of the dress, and the rear columns.</p><p>For the latest information about this object, <cite><a href='https://purl.thewalters.org/art/22.171' rel='external'>Block Statue of Nes-Ba-Neb-Dedet</a></cite>, visit the Online Collection of the Walters Art Museum.</p>
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Photograph of a seated block statue with a rounded head and a wig-like headdress, shown frontally with the torso covered by dense hieroglyphic inscriptions.
The object is a dark, compact stone block statue depicting a man in a typical Egyptian block-statue format. The figure’s head is rounded with a wig/headdress indicated by carved contours; the face is forward-facing with simplified eyes and a suggestion of a mouth. The upper arms and chest merge into the block form. Most of the front surface is filled with carved hieroglyphs arranged in horizontal and vertical registers, suggesting an offering or commemorative text associated with the statue owner. No cartouche is clearly legible in the provided image. The lower portion has a band of additional incised text and/or decorative register lines. Edges and surface show wear and minor chips, but the inscriptions remain largely visible though not fully readable at this resolution. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible.
Inscriptions (2)
English description
English description
Cross-references (2)
- Walters-AccNum 22.171 tier-2
- Walters-id 9122 tier-2
Similar inscriptions · by content embedding
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Walters Art Museum (Egyptian).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.

