no image
ORAEC
ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus) · other
pBerlin P 10473 B (98 G) / pBerlin P 10473 B (98 G)
Description
Archive, Urkunden, Vermerke (Altes Reich)→Abusir〈-Archiv〉→Tafel 98→pBerlin P 10473 B (98 G)→pBerlin P 10473 B (98 G)
The same text in other collections
Linked by Trismegistos ID
TM 755239.
Each record below describes this same ancient text from a different angle.
- pBerlin P 10474 A-B recto (92A-93A) / pBerlin P 10474 A-B recto (92A-93A) ORAEC textAbusir
- pBerlin P 10474 A-B verso (94A-96A) / pBerlin P 10474 A-B verso (94A-96A) ORAEC textAbusir
- pBerlin P 10473 A (93 B) / pBerlin P 10473 A (93 B) ORAEC textAbusir
- pBerlin P 10473 A (92 B) / pBerlin P 10473 A (92 B) ORAEC textAbusir
- pBerlin P 10473 B (48 F) / pBerlin P 10473 B (48 F) ORAEC textAbusir
- pBerlin P 10473 A (92 C) / pBerlin P 10473 A (92 C) ORAEC textAbusir
- pBerlin P 10473 B (89 L) / pBerlin P 10473 B (89 L) ORAEC textAbusir
- pBerlin P 10473 verso (75 L) / pBerlin P 10473 verso (75 L) ORAEC textAbusir
- pBerlin P 10473 B (94 I) / pBerlin P 10473 B (94 I) ORAEC textAbusir
- pBerlin P 10473 B (94 D) / pBerlin P 10473 B (94 D) ORAEC textAbusir
- pBerlin P 10473 (78 A) / pBerlin P 10473 (A) ORAEC textAbusir
- pBerlin P 10473 B (98 K) / pBerlin P 10473 B (98 K) ORAEC textAbusir
Inscriptions (1)
Inscription #1
· Egyptian
Transcription
⸢30⸣ ⸢30⸣ ⸢30⸣ ⸢30⸣Translations (1)
keine Übersetzung vorhanden
Connections
Found at
Abusir
Cross-references (3)
- TLA-Text JIK3SKG4NVF6XDMCAZSMPP7IEQ tier-1
- TM-Text 755239 tier-1
- ORAEC-id oraec8681 tier-2
Similar inscriptions · by content embedding
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.