Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Scarab Inscribed for Thutmose I

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Steatite, glazed

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

An oval scarab made of dark stone with a raised, incised design and hieroglyphic inscription on its face.

The image shows a single scarab-shaped amulet photographed against a light background. The back or face contains a carved/inked motif: at left a seated or standing figure-like form with arms out, and at center a vertical element resembling a column of hieroglyphs. To the right are additional rounded/spiral-like signs and a small circular dot motif near the lower right. A band of incised lines and borders frames parts of the inscription. No clear cartouche framing is visible, and no readable royal name is confidently identifiable from the image resolution. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible. The material surface appears matte with mottled coloration consistent with stone; a glossy glazed appearance is not clearly discernible from this single view.

decorative New Kingdom (as catalogued) good
Deities unknown
Royals Thutmose I (catalogued; not clearly readable in image)
Materials stone (likely steatite/greenish stone; glaze not clearly visible)
Signs incised/raised hieroglyphic signs (unreadable individual forms) ×4

Connections

Deities Ra
Royals Thutmose I

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116276757 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 30.8.489 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 560006 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.