Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · vessel

Model Dish from a Foundation Deposit

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Travertine (Egyptian alabaster)

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Stone circular object with a central shallow circular depression resembling a dish or bowl, surrounded by an incised ring of smaller marks that may relate to decorative border elements.

The image shows a rounded, disc-like stone artifact photographed from above against a dark background. The center has a shallow, circular well with smoother edges, forming a model dish/bowl profile. Around the central well is a raised border ring with an outer field containing numerous small, wedge- or dash-shaped incisions in rows/circulating arcs. Some incisions appear worn/abraded but remain visible as deliberate tool marks. No clear human, animal, or deity figure is visible. No legible hieroglyphic text, cartouches, or inscriptions are clearly identifiable from the provided image resolution. The overall surface color is light tan to off-white, consistent with pale stone such as travertine/“Egyptian alabaster.”

decorative New Kingdom (catalogue ground truth; inscriptionless form factor—unclear from image alone) fragmentary
Materials light tan/off-white pale stone (consistent with travertine/“Egyptian alabaster”)

Connections

Royals Thutmose IV

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116435862 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 30.8.23 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 559963 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.