Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Fragment of tile

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Faience

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small, irregular fragment of an Egyptian faience tile showing part of a recessed ornamental register and traces of turquoise-green glaze.

The object is a broken fragment with a curved top and flat base edge. One face preserves a moulded design: a central vertical element bordered by raised mouldings, and beneath it a rectangular/arched motif that resembles a cartouche-like or architectural panel with horizontal lines. The overall surface is covered by remaining turquoise-green glazed areas, with many chips exposing a brownish substrate. No clear royal name cartouche text, deity determinatives, or legible hieroglyphs are preserved. Small darker dots and linear moulding elements are visible as part of the ornamentation. At the bottom right, a small red ink/paint mark appears on the photograph, but it is not an ancient inscription. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible.

decorative New Kingdom (Ramesside period), per catalogue; exact date uncertain from fragment. fragmentary
Materials faience (glazed ceramic)turquoise-green glaze

Connections

Royals Seti II

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116280810 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 10.130.1681 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 558742 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.