Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · funerary_equipment

Funerary Cone of the Wab-Priest Tjay

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Pottery

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A gray, weathered pottery funerary cone is shown in close-up with an incised hieroglyphic register of text down the face.

The image depicts a single small funerary cone-like object photographed against a light background. The surface is rough and worn, with minor chips and abrasions along the edges. A vertical column of incised hieroglyphs runs down the face; the sign forms are partially eroded but clearly arranged as hieroglyphic text. No legible Greek, Coptic, or Arabic script is visible. No explicit royal cartouche can be confirmed from the photo due to erosion, and no clearly identifiable deity name is fully readable; therefore, identifications beyond “hieroglyphic text present” are limited.

funerary New Kingdom (as ground truth from catalogue) fragmentary
Materials potteryceramic surface (gray, fired)
Signs incised hieroglyphs in a vertical column (exact signs unreadable due to wear)

Connections

Royals Amenhotep I

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116243841 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 15.2.66 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 555056 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.