Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · funerary_equipment

Funerary Cone of Amenhotep and His Wife Ren

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Pottery

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A rounded pottery funerary cone bearing a band of carved hieroglyphs around its surface.

The image shows a single, darkened, rounded cone-like object photographed from above. A circular/arched register of incised hieroglyphic signs runs across the top portion, with additional smaller marks clustered toward the center. The hieroglyphs are worn and partially obscured by surface damage and shadow, making specific sign forms difficult to read confidently. No clear royal cartouche, throne name, or personal name inscriptions (e.g., Amenhotep, Ren) are legible at this resolution.

funerary New Kingdom (ground-truth from catalogue; inscription too unclear to securely refine further from the image alone) fragmentary
Materials pottery (incised/carved surface)
Signs incised hieroglyphic signs in a band/register (individual signs not reliably readable) ×10

Connections

Deities Amun
Royals Thutmose I

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116244224 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 30.6.111 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 554916 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.