Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Column Fragment of Amenemhat I

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Limestone

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

The image shows a photographed drawing of a broken Egyptian stone column fragment with an inked-out top view and a lower elevation drawing that includes faint carved surface details and a small hieroglyphic-like motif.

A large, rounded/irregular fragment of a rectangular stone column is depicted in outline from above (top view) and in elevation from the side. In the top view, the surface is plain and light-colored with no clearly legible carved text or figures visible at this scale. The elevation at the bottom shows the fragment’s banded/striated edges and a small recessed central cartouche-like or sign-containing panel area, but the individual hieroglyphs are too unclear to read reliably from the provided image. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. The overall depiction is consistent with a limestone column element from the Middle Kingdom, but the specific royal name Amenemhat I is not legible in the image.

royal Middle Kingdom (per catalogue) fragmentary
Royals Amenemhat I (not legible in image; identification based on catalogue title)
Materials limestone (implied by grey/stone depiction and catalogue)
Signs Unclear carved sign(s) in a small central panel (possibly part of a royal name/cartouche)

Connections

Found at Lisht
Royals Amenemhat I

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116431041 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 09.180.525 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 555676 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.