Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Scarab Inscribed for the King's Principal Wife Ahmose

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Steatite, glazed

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Green glazed scarab-shaped amulet/plaque bearing an incised inscription and decorative bands and animals on its surface.

The image shows an oval scarab form with a glossy green glaze over a dark substrate. The upper border has a recessed/outlined band. The face is filled with dark incised hieroglyphic signs and small figures placed in different orientations, including a vertical central column of signs and a lower scene-like grouping with a seated/standing bird or small animal element and other symbols. The lower area includes a wing-like or feathered motif near the right side and a horizontal line/ground mark. No clear cartouche box is visible in the provided view. There is no visible Greek, Coptic, or Arabic script. The inscription is clearly present but too damaged/unclear to reliably transcribe individual signs beyond noting that they are Egyptian hieroglyphs. The material appearance is consistent with the catalogue’s steatite body with a glazed surface.

hieroglyphic only New Kingdom (consistent with catalogue) good
Materials glaze (green)stone (likely steatite)
Signs Egyptian hieroglyphic signs (incised, darkened) ×6

Connections

Royals Thutmose I

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116245175 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 30.8.496 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 553936 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.