Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Cartouche-Shaped Inlay with the Name of Thutmose I

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Wood

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Small, weathered, arch/standing-shaped wooden inlay fragment with dark and bluish residues in recessed areas that may once have held pigments or inlay materials.

The object is photographed against a plain white background. It appears roughly cartouche-like in profile (tapering at the top and wider at the bottom), with a rounded upper end and a flatter base. The surface is heavily worn and darkened, with several recessed grooves/areas where colored substance remains: notably two small bluish patches near the upper/middle portion and additional dark outlines around carved channels. No clear, fully legible hieroglyphs or a complete cartouche formula are visible at this resolution; any former incised lines are too eroded to reliably transcribe. No additional inscriptions in Greek, Coptic, or Arabic are visible.

unclear New Kingdom (catalogue ground truth), exact dating unclear from image alone poor
Royals Thutmose I (catalogue-provided; not legible in image)
Materials wooddark surface residuebluish pigment/residue (in recesses; material unknown)
Signs cartouche or hieroglyphic recesses (indistinct/uncertain)

Connections

Royals Thutmose I

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116386078 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 30.8.251 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 554331 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.