Book of the Dead of the Priest of Horus, Imhotep (Imuthes)
Description
Papyrus, ink
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Long, horizontal Egyptian papyrus painted with multiple dense lines of hieroglyphic text and framed vignettes on the right side, including depictions of deities and funerary scenes.
The image shows a rectangular papyrus scroll laid flat, with a tan/brown papyrus surface. The majority of the field is filled with tightly spaced, dark hieroglyphic writing in horizontal registers. Along the far right margin there are larger, compartmentalized vignette panels with outline drawings: a central standing figure (likely a god) appears above and/or between smaller figures in register-like scenes. Additional small figures and symbols occupy the lower right panels. No clearly legible cartouche or royal titulary is visible at this resolution; if any boxed inscriptions exist, the exact characters are not distinguishable enough to transcribe reliably. There is no visible Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text. The catalogued title indicates a Book of the Dead of a priest of Horus named Imhotep/Imuthes; while the scene type and funerary corpus are consistent, the specific name 'Imhotep/Imuthes' and explicit 'Priest of Horus' labeling are not readable in this image.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116235183 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 35.9.20a–w tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 551786 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.