Flail scepter from the tomb of Senebtisi
Description
Faience, wood, carnelian, gold, wood, paint
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
The image shows a long, wand-like flail scepter with a decorated handle and three ribbed/rod elements tied together at the top, photographed against a plain background.
A single elongated staff or shaft extends diagonally from the lower right toward the upper left, with darker bands running along its length and a slightly flared/pointed end at the upper left. At the upper-left end, three short cylindrical/rod-like elements descend downward; these are wrapped with repeated dark-and-light bands and end in rounded tips. The handle area appears to have beaded or segmented decoration (small ring-like elements in alternating colors). No clear hieroglyphic text, cartouches, or identifiable royal inscriptions are visible on the pictured surfaces. No human figures or deities are depicted; the object appears to be purely a ceremonial implement. The photograph is monochrome, so material identification is limited to visible surface qualities; the catalogue’s listed materials cannot be confirmed directly from the image alone, though the alternating colored bands suggest painted or inlaid elements consistent with faience and gold/paint effects.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116248095 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 07.227.15 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 544287 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.