Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Khonsu shrine amulet

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Egyptian blue

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Small blue faience Egyptian shrine-shaped amulet with a recessed rectangular opening on one face and a patterned band along the top.

The object appears as a compact, upright shrine amulet in blue material. Its upper section is molded with a dense, rounded bead-like or blocky pattern forming a thick band across the top. Below this band are shallow molded horizontal lines. The front face includes a dark, hollow rectangular recess/opening (likely where the amulet’s protective element or void is formed). The bottom has a slight projecting base with molded bands. No clear full hieroglyphs, cartouches, or readable inscriptions are visible in this single view. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is present. The surface color matches the catalogued Egyptian blue, and the overall form is consistent with a shrine amulet of the Late Period style, though specific deity name/signs cannot be confirmed from the image alone.

decorative Late Period (?), based on catalogued attribution; exact dating unclear from image alone good
Materials egyptian blue (blue faience/ceramic surface)

Connections

Deities Khonsu

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116253351 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 1984.177 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 551004 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.