Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Aegis of Sakhmet or Bastet

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Faience

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Small blue faience figurine-like object depicting a front-facing seated/standing deity figure with a prominent wig and flared, wing-like or shield-like body element.

The image shows a sky-blue faience object photographed against a plain light background. The figure faces forward, with a round head topped by a rounded coiffure/wig mass. The face has incised features (eyes and mouth) and a simplified hairstyle/neck area. The upper body appears to wear a broad, layered garment or collar. The lower portion flares outward in two lobes, forming a shape that could be read as an aegis/shield form associated with a lioness or cat deity, consistent with the catalogue topic “Aegis of Sakhmet or Bastet,” though specific iconographic markers are not fully distinct in this resolution. No clear cartouches, readable hieroglyphs, or Greek/Coptic/Arabic inscriptions are visible. The surface is mottled with light speckling and weathering, consistent with glazed faience.

decorative Late Period–Ptolemaic Period (as catalogued; specific finer dating unclear from image) good
Deities Sakhmet (iconography unclear)Bastet (iconography unclear)
Materials faience (blue glazed surface)

Connections

Deities Bastet

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116275752 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 10.130.2055 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 548215 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.