Sacred animal mummy in the form typical of a wrapped ibis, decorated with a figure of Duamutef
Description
Linen, animal remains, paint
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A narrow, mummiform bundle with painted decoration, showing a standing human-headed deity-like figure in black on a tan ground with additional vertical motifs.
The object appears as a tall, tapered, mummy-like wrapping or tube. The surface is tan/brown with areas of wear and fading. A prominent black-painted figure occupies most of the visible face: a human-like figure standing in profile or three-quarter view with an oval or halo-like element above the head and a staff/standing object held or positioned near the body. Several schematic lines and patterned bands extend around and across the figure, suggesting stylized garb or symbolic devices. The top includes a circular/ovoid form that could relate to a head attribute, and there are diagonal hatch-like strokes within a rectangular-like border at the midsection. No clear animal (ibis) form is distinctly identifiable from this single view, but the overall presentation (mummiform body with painted iconography) is consistent with a sacred-animal mummy casing decorated with a deity figure, as in the catalogue description. No readable hieroglyphic text is clearly legible; the motifs are primarily figural and abstract rather than clearly inscribed letters. No cartouches or royal titulary are visible.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116276430 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 90.6.109 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 547745 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.