Scarab Inscsribed With the Name Aakheperkare (Thutmose I)
Description
glazed steatite
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Oval scarab seal with an incised scene or figures surrounded by a thick border, filled with dark green/black linework on a turquoise-green glazed surface.
The image shows a single small oval scarab (likely the beetle form used as a seal) set against a plain light background. The scarab’s face is turquoise/green with a glossy glaze. Around the perimeter there is a darker ring/border. Inside, there are bold dark line-incisions forming what appears to be hieroglyphic signs and/or a stylized emblem; an upright, elongated wedge-like element dominates the left side, while clustered circular and animal-like or human-like forms appear on the right. The incised areas are filled or outlined in dark pigment/linework, suggesting an inscribed scarab rather than a blank ornament. No clear cartouche shape is visible from this angle, and the specific royal name (Aakheperkare/Thutmose I) cannot be confidently read. No separate Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible; only the dark inscribed marks consistent with Egyptian hieroglyphs are present. The visible surface wear is light, with small chips or abrasions at the rim.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116243738 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 26.7.144 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 545551 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.