Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

String of beads

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Lapis lazuli, carnelian, gold (restrung from this photo)

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

The image shows a close, side-on view of a single-strand string of small beads, including a round bead and multiple elongated cylindrical beads.

The photograph depicts a short section of a bead string laid horizontally. A larger, round bead appears at the far left, followed by several elongated, barrel/cylinder-shaped beads in a line toward the right. The beads have a dark, glossy appearance consistent with polished stone. No hieroglyphic, cartouche, or other inscriptions are visible on the image. No identifiable divine iconography is present, and there are no royal names or cartouches. The materials are not independently confirmable from the photo alone (colors could suggest lapis lazuli/carnelian, but the image is grayscale), so they are recorded as 'unclear' rather than asserting specific stones. Condition appears fair to good for the photographed segment; beads are intact with no obvious major breaks in the view.

decorative Late Middle Kingdom (catalogue ground truth; not visually confirmable from the photo) good
Materials unknown polished dark stone (exact type unclear from grayscale photo)

Connections

Found at Lisht
Materials Stone

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116280682 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 22.1.138 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 546828 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.