
Head of a Priest
Description
<p>This head is carved in the round. The priest's head is shaven with a flat top. His ears are broken off, and traces are polished away. His nose, mouth, and chin are restored.</p><p>For the latest information about this object, <cite><a href='https://purl.thewalters.org/art/22.358' rel='external'>Head of a Priest</a></cite>, visit the Online Collection of the Walters Art Museum.</p>
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A carved stone head in profile, shown against a white background and mounted on a square plinth, with a placard that reads "HARD STONE. - HEAD - FOUND IN UPPER EGYPT."
The image depicts a sculpted male head with a rounded skull and short, closely worked hair/mass of stone at the top. The face is carved in low relief with a defined nose, closed lips, and a slight suggestion of eye shape; the neck transitions into a broken or simplified base. The head is mounted vertically on a dark rectangular pedestal block with a lighter label area. No clear hieroglyphs, cartouches, or inscriptions appear on the sculpture itself in the provided view. The placard includes English text: "HARD STONE. - HEAD - FOUND IN UPPER EGYPT." The catalog ground truth describes the object as a "Head of a Priest" made of gray granite; the visible material appears consistent with a dark gray stone (black/dark gray) but the exact granite is not independently verifiable from the image alone. No identifiable deities or royal names are visible.
Inscriptions (2)
English description
English description
Cross-references (2)
- Walters-AccNum 22.358 tier-2
- Walters-id 31721 tier-2
Similar inscriptions · by content embedding
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Walters Art Museum (Egyptian).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.


