Tail (replica) for beadwork apron of Senebtisi
Description
Light and dark green, blue and black faience, paint
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Object appears to be a beaded textile element: a rectangular green patterned top border attached to multiple vertical strands terminating in small bead/metal-like loops, with a gold-toned trim and a small cartouche-like mark at the upper right.
The image shows a flat, rectangular strip with a densely patterned upper band in alternating green tones (light/dark) and a grid-like bead or painted decoration. From this band hang many vertical beaded strings or cords, each composed of small alternating dark and light segments and green/blue-tinted beads spaced along the length. A gold-toned rod/trim runs along the top center/right region, and on the lower edge of the strip a small folded/finished section is visible. At the upper right corner there is a small gold-edged cartouche-like panel with dark markings inside; the markings are too unclear to securely read as a specific royal name. No other legible hieroglyphic lines, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text are visible. The overall appearance matches a replica-style beadwork component rather than a carved single artifact.
Connections
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116297780 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 08.200.29f tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 692413 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.