Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Scarab with the name Wahibre, either Psamtik I or Apries

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

onyx or hematite

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A dark, oval scarab seal with a carved central motif resembling a stylized scarab and surrounding rounded forms; no clearly legible inscription is visible in the provided view.

The image shows a small, polished scarab-shaped object viewed from the front. The surface is dark and glossy, with light reflections and small scratches. The central carving includes a vertical, insect-like form and adjacent rounded elements, but the engraving lacks sufficient clarity to confidently read specific hieroglyphs or a royal cartouche. The edges are smooth and rounded, consistent with an intaglio/engraved scarab seal face. No surrounding Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible, and no distinct cartouche is discernible. The ground-truth catalogue attributes the material as onyx or hematite and the period as Late Period; the visible color and gloss are consistent with a dark stone, but the image alone does not confirm the exact stone type. Overall condition appears good with minor surface wear.

decorative Late Period (as catalogued) good
Materials dark glossy stone (onyx or hematite per catalogue; exact type unclear)

Connections

Royals Psamtik I
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.