Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · statue

Harpokrates

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Bronze

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Small bronze figurine of a mummiform youth standing on a rectangular base, wearing a side-lock wig and holding one hand up to the mouth while the other arm hangs at the side.

The image shows a single standing figure associated with Egyptian child/juvenile deity iconography. The figure has a bald/closely shaven head with a prominent wig or tripartite side-lock hairstyle and wears a short kilt. The right hand is raised near the mouth in a gesture consistent with “Harpokrates” iconography (finger/hand to mouth), while the left arm hangs down. A large, mushroom-like headdress sits atop the head—interpretable as an ornate crown/element rather than a full feathered atef—though the precise type cannot be confidently determined from the photograph. The figure’s style and materials are consistent with a small cast bronze votive statue. No clear hieroglyphic, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible on the object or base in this image, and no cartouches are readable.

religious Late Period–Ptolemaic (as catalogued) good
Deities Harpokrates (iconography; inscription not visible)
Materials bronze

Connections

Found at Hibis
Deities Harpocrates
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.