Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · ostracon

Ostracon

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Pottery, ink

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A broken pottery ostracon fragment with dark ink hieroglyphic signs arranged in a short horizontal line and columns near the right side.

The image shows a small, irregularly broken terracotta/brown ostracon with one edge missing and the surface worn. Dark pigment/ink (charcoal-black) forms groups of hieroglyphic signs. On the right half, multiple repeated small sign forms appear in a cluster arranged roughly in a vertical/stepped sequence, while near the upper/middle area there is a short line of larger, roughly silhouetted sign marks. No legible cartouche, royal titulary, or deity name is clearly identifiable from the current resolution; the signs are present but too indistinct for confident identification of specific glyphs. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic script is visible. The catalogue’s described ink inscription is consistent with the visible dark writing; the object itself appears to be pottery with writing, matching the ostracon category. The fragment lacks any painted decoration besides the ink.

hieroglyphic only Late Period–Ptolemaic Period (per catalogue; specific signs not clear enough to refine) fragmentary
Materials pottery/terracottaink/black pigment
Signs multiple repeated hieroglyphic sign marks (unidentified due to resolution) ×20

Connections

Found at Hibis
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.