Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Fragment of a Canopic Chest of Queen Tiya

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Travertine (Egyptian alabaster)

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Photograph of a broken fragment of an Egyptian stone chest with relief-carved vertical decorative bands; detailed inscriptions are too fragmentary to read clearly.

The image shows two joined stone pieces forming part of a larger object. The surface is light-colored (stone) and bears shallow relief carving or incised ornament in vertical registers, with remnants of circular/oval forms and wing-like or panel-like outlines on the right portion. Several small dark marks and weathering/abrasion obscure any fine details. No legible hieroglyphs, cartouches, or distinct iconographic figures (e.g., specific deities) are clearly identifiable at this resolution and condition. The overall form and carving style are consistent with carved stone components of funerary equipment such as a canopic chest, but the photograph alone does not allow confirmation of Queen Tiya specifically.

funerary New Kingdom (matches catalogue; exact reign unclear from visible fragment) fragmentary
Materials light-colored carved stone (consistent with travertine/egyptian alabaster per catalogue)

Connections

Royals Thutmose IV

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116234986 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 14.6.373b tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 577022 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.