Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · ostracon

Demotic Temple Oath

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Pottery, ink

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A broken, reddish-brown terracotta sherd covered with dense ink writing in a script that appears to be Demotic (dark lines in rows).

The image shows a polygonal fragment of pottery (terracotta) with a matte reddish surface. Across most of the visible face are many short, flowing lines of dark ink arranged in horizontal rows, consistent with Demotic text on a ceramic support. No clear cartouche (oval ring with hieroglyphic name), royal titulary, or explicitly identifiable deity figure is visible at this resolution. The upper right edge includes a small modern pencil/ink mark, but the main text is ancient. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic characters are clearly legible in the provided image. The fragmentary nature and dense layout suggest a written statement or oath text rather than a pictorial scene.

hieroglyphic only Ptolemaic Period (consistent with Demotic documentary/temple-related texts on ceramic supports); exact sub-period unclear. fragmentary
Materials pottery (terracotta)ink (dark text)
Signs Demotic/encursive cursive script lines (general)

Connections

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116273127 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 21.2.122 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 569661 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.