Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Scarab Inscribed Amunrehotep

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Pottery

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small, rounded scarab-shaped object made of reddish-brown material, with worn incised markings that resemble a hieroglyphic inscription on the back.

The image shows a single scarab-like artifact photographed against a plain light background. The back surface is oval and convex, with pitted wear and a darkened, earthy patina. Incised lines and boxed/rectangular areas are visible near the center, along with a few isolated signs (one curved/loop-like form and another that may resemble a vertical stroke). The exact hieroglyphs are too abraded to confidently read; no clear cartouche borders or fully legible royal name is present. No legible Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible. No distinct metallic or glassy elements are apparent; the surface appears ceramic-like or clay/terracotta-like. The specific deity Amun and the name Amunrehotep cannot be verified from the visible, worn marks.

decorative New Kingdom (catalogue ground truth; visible text too worn to confirm) fragmentary
Materials pottery/ceramic-like surface (reddish-brown with patina)
Signs Unidentified incised sign cluster (likely hieroglyphic) ×3

Connections

Deities AmunRaAmun-Ra
Royals Amenhotep I

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116244495 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 26.7.126 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 554726 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.