Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Menat fragment

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Glazed limestone

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Fragmentary green-glazed limestone object with a recessed, cartouche-like field containing a vertically arranged motif resembling a menat pendant design.

The image shows a roughly rounded fragment with broken edges on the left and right. The surface is green/teal with a worn glaze, suggesting a glazed limestone core. A recessed central panel is bordered by vertical grooves; within the panel there is an oval/rounded cartouche-like enclosure containing a small raised figure or symbol at the top and a larger vertical element beneath. A lower portion of an additional motif is partially preserved near the bottom edge of the panel. No complete hieroglyphic text is clearly legible; the markings appear more like decorative iconography in relief than readable inscriptions. A red painted accession/collection number ("M.1699") is visible on the bottom edge. No cartouches of royal names are clearly identifiable from the fragment, and no Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is present.

decorative Late Period, Saite (catalogue ground truth; exact dating not independently confirmable from this small fragment). fragmentary
Deities unknown
Materials glazed limestonegreen/teal glaze (worn)
Signs decorative oval/cartouche-like enclosure with stacked motif (menat-related iconography)

Connections

Royals Psamtik I

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116419969 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 10.130.1699 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 553013 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.