Art Institute of Chicago (Egyptian) · scarab

Scarab: Menkheperra (Thutmose III)

Source of record: Art Institute of Chicago (Egyptian) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Two views of a small Egyptian scarab-shaped amulet carved in dark stone, shown front and back (or two sides).

The image presents an oval scarab (probably a bezel or inlaid amulet) photographed against a light background. The left view shows the back of the beetle with a central vertical ridge and incised linear elements; the right view shows the carved underside with raised relief figures occupying the field. The underside includes legible-looking columnar signs on the left and a large, central motif resembling a deity-like or royal emblem with surrounding small decorative elements; however, the full names and sign groups are not clear enough to reliably read specific text. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. The catalogue claims this is a scarab inscribed for Menkheperra (Thutmose III), but the image resolution does not allow a confident identification of the exact royal name/cartouche on the right-side engraving; partial sign shapes suggest inscription but not enough for a secure match.

decorative New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty (likely; exact reign attribution uncertain from image alone) good
Materials Stone
Signs Unclear carved hieroglyphic/rebus signs (grouped, non-readable at this resolution) ×6

Inscriptions (1)

Inscription #1

English description

"The Good God, the Lord of the Two Lands, Men-kheper-Re"

Connections

Royals Thutmose III

Cross-references (1)

  • ARTIC-id 133977 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Art Institute of Chicago (Egyptian).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.