Cartonnage Fragment with Goddess Seshat
Description
Caption: Cartonnage Fragment with Goddess Seshat, ca. 1075–712 B.C.E.. Linen, gesso, pigment, 10 13/16 × 5 11/16 × 11/16 in. (27.4 × 14.4 × 1.8 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.2049E.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Painted cartonnage fragment showing a bearded, human-headed female deity figure holding or associated with a measuring/ceremonial instrument-like form above the head.
The fragment is a vertically oriented, thick molded/painted surface with losses along the edges. A central, profile figure (dark-painted skin tone, red garment details) wears an elaborate headdress and is shown from about the torso upward. Above and slightly behind the head is a circular/halo-like element containing a white-and-dark cross-like or spoke-like motif, suggesting a symbolic attribute or crown detail. The figure holds a long, staff-like object or implements across the body; the object is partially obscured by flaking paint but appears to include a straight handle and a forked/rectangular end. Behind the figure are remnants of vertical black banding or a background column. The paint scheme includes black outlines, red and dark brown/greenish areas, and cream/orange ground. No clearly legible hieroglyphic text is visible on this fragment. The image overall matches the museum catalogue subject as a cartonnage fragment with a goddess figure, though the specific identity (Seshat) cannot be confirmed from inscriptions or uniquely identifying attributes in the provided view.
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 37.2049E tier-2
- BKM-Object 224163 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.