Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · statue

Sunk Relief of a King

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Caption: Sunk Relief of a King, ca. 874–773 B.C.E.. Limestone, 27 x 12 1/4 x 4in. (68.6 x 31.1 x 10.2cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 1991.40. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A weathered limestone relief block showing the upper part of a seated or standing royal figure with a stylized headpiece and wig.

The image shows a carved, recessed (sunk) relief panel on a roughly rectangular limestone fragment. The central focus is a king’s head and upper torso/profile: a broad wig with curled lateral forms, a broad forehead, and a ceremonial headpiece. Facial features are simplified but include an eye shape and a short beard or beard shadow at the chin area. The mouth and nose are indicated in low relief lines. A raised, circular or looped element appears near the forehead/hat area, but no clear royal name cartouche is visible. No readable hieroglyphic text is apparent on the visible surfaces, and there are no clearly legible Greek/Coptic/Arabic inscriptions. The background field is plain, with faint tool marks and erosion consistent with age.

royal Third Intermediate Period (per catalogue); exact sub-period uncertain from image alone fragmentary
Materials limestone

Connections

Found at Delta
Materials Limestone

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 1991.40 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 4235 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.