Fitzwilliam Museum — Department of Antiquities (Egyptian) · jewelry

scarab

Source of record: Fitzwilliam Museum — Department of Antiquities (Egyptian) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small brown, oval stone/ceramic object with incised markings on its face, shown against a neutral background. The marks resemble vertical hieroglyphic characters near the left side of the object.

The image depicts an oval scarab-like object, photographed from above at a slight angle. The surface is brown and worn, with visible abrasions and cracks. On the left half of the face there are dark, incised strokes that appear to form at least one vertical line of characters; the clearest readable portion looks like a sequence resembling “S C I 7 3” (not fully confident). No clear winged scarab iconography (e.g., legs/antennae) is distinctly visible in this view, but the overall shape and placement are consistent with a carved scarab amulet/seal. No other text in Greek/Coptic/Arabic is visible. No cartouche is clearly legible, and no deity figure is apparent beyond the possible hieroglyphic inscription.

decorative unknown poor
Materials brown stone or fired ceramic (unclear)
Signs incised hieroglyphic strokes (exact signs unclear) ×6
Visible text "Possible vertical hieroglyphic sequence; appears like “...5 C I 7 3...” (unclear)"

Connections

Found at Egypt
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Fitzwilliam Museum — Department of Antiquities (Egyptian).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.